نسخهٔ فارسی

Transparent, non-custodial, yours

Where a rollup actually saves you money

Rollups batch transactions and post compressed data to Ethereum. That is where the saving comes from, and why L2 fees still rise with mainnet.

Execution on L2 Near-zero; capacity is abundant
Data posting Priced by Ethereum — this is why L2 fees still move
Optimistic vs ZK Similar fees; very different withdrawal latency

FBT Swap

What you should know

A rollup is not cheap because it cut corners on security. It is cheap because hundreds of transactions share the cost of one settlement on Ethereum, and because that settlement posts compressed data rather than full execution.

The consequence is that a rollup fee has two parts with completely different behaviour, and only one of them is under the rollup's control.

Execution cost is genuinely small

Running your transaction on the rollup itself costs almost nothing. The sequencer has abundant capacity relative to demand, so the execution portion of the fee is typically a rounding error.

This is why simple transfers and swaps on rollups cost cents or less while the same operation on mainnet can cost dollars.

Data cost is inherited from Ethereum

The rollup must publish enough data for anyone to reconstruct its state. That publication happens on Ethereum and is priced by Ethereum. Dedicated data space made this dramatically cheaper than it used to be, but it still moves with mainnet demand.

So when mainnet is congested, rollup fees rise too — from a much lower base, and usually by a smaller absolute amount than the saving.

Optimistic and zero-knowledge differ in withdrawal, not fees

Optimistic rollups assume validity and allow a challenge window, which is why a native withdrawal to Ethereum takes days. Zero-knowledge rollups publish a validity proof, so withdrawal can be fast once the proof is on-chain.

Both compress data the same way, so the day-to-day fee experience is similar. The difference shows up when you want your funds back on mainnet.

Choosing a network for cost

For small and medium trades, any supported rollup or low-fee chain beats mainnet by a wide margin. For large trades, depth matters more than the few dollars of gas, and mainnet often has the deepest pools.

FBT Swap supports Ethereum alongside Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Linea, Scroll, zkSync Era and Unichain, and shows the fee and route for the network you actually selected.

At a glance

At a glance

Execution on L2

Near-zero; capacity is abundant

Data posting

Priced by Ethereum — this is why L2 fees still move

Optimistic vs ZK

Similar fees; very different withdrawal latency

Choose L2 when

Trade size is small enough that fixed gas matters

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Clear answers before you decide.

Are layer 2 networks less secure?

They inherit settlement security from Ethereum but add their own assumptions — sequencer behaviour, proof systems and upgrade keys among them. "Inherits Ethereum security" is accurate about settlement and incomplete about everything else.

Why did my rollup fee suddenly triple?

Almost always because mainnet data costs rose. The rollup did not change its pricing; the Ethereum space it must buy got more expensive for a while.

Can I move tokens between rollups directly?

Only through a bridge, which is a separate transaction with its own cost and its own risk. Two rollups do not share state just because they settle to the same chain.

Risk notice

Crypto assets are volatile and on-chain transactions cannot be reversed. You can lose money, including all of it. Nothing here is financial advice.