Common factor in losses
The victim signed something
Transparent, non-custodial, yours
Approval drainers, fake tokens, address poisoning, phishing clones, honeypots and support impersonation. The real attacks, and the checks that stop them.
FBT Swap
Almost nobody loses crypto to a broken cryptographic primitive. They lose it to a signature they did not read, a token contract they did not check, an address they copied from the wrong place, or a person who claimed to be support.
Every page in this hub describes one real attack, shows what it looks like on screen, and gives the check that defeats it. FBT Swap will never ask for your recovery phrase, never message you first, and cannot recover funds sent to the wrong address — so the defence has to happen before you sign.
Almost every large crypto loss follows the same shape: the victim signed something. Not a broken cipher, not a stolen server — an approval, a transfer, a message that looked like a login. Attacks in this space target judgement under time pressure, because that is the cheapest attack surface available.
The defences that work are correspondingly behavioural. Read what you are signing. Navigate from an address you saved yourself. Assume urgency is manufactured. These cost nothing and cover more real-world loss than any tool.
At a glance
The victim signed something
Judgement under time pressure, not cryptography
Reading the signature request in full
fbtswap.ir only — and we never message you first
FAQ
Clear answers before you decide.
Reading every signature request before approving: which token, how much, and to which address. Most drains would fail against that one habit.
No. Confirmed on-chain transactions are final, and a non-custodial interface has no mechanism to freeze, reverse or refund anything.
Crypto assets are volatile and on-chain transactions cannot be reversed. You can lose money, including all of it. Nothing here is financial advice.