Transparent, non-custodial, yours

Custodial vs non-custodial, without the slogans

Custody is not a feature you switch on. It decides who can move your assets, who can freeze them, and who answers when something goes wrong. A plain comparison, including the parts self-custody does not solve.

Custody in this app None. FBT Swap does not take deposits and holds no keys
Recovery phrase Never requested by the app — anyone who asks for it is not this app
What we can do Show you the quote, the route, the fee and the exact transaction to sign

FBT Swap

What you should know

“Not your keys, not your coins” is true and incomplete. Self-custody removes one class of risk and adds another, and the useful question is not which one is better in the abstract, but which risks you are personally able to carry.

This page is a comparison, not an advertisement for either shape. FBT Swap is a non-custodial interface, so the bias is on the table.

What custody decides

Custody decides who holds the key that can move an asset. When a platform holds it, the balance on your screen is a record in that platform’s database — a claim against them — and the asset moves when they say it moves. When you hold it, the balance is on the chain and only a signature from your device moves it.

That single difference produces the long list of consequences people usually argue about: whether your account can be frozen, whether a withdrawal can be delayed for review, whether a lost password can be reset, and what happens to your balance if the operator becomes insolvent.

What you give up by holding your own keys

Recovery. There is no password reset for a wallet. If the recovery phrase is lost and the device is gone, the assets are gone, permanently. Every non-custodial product is built around this and none of them can undo it.

Reversibility. A signed transaction is final. Nobody can call it back, and nobody can intervene if you were tricked into signing a transfer or an approval that hands over spending rights.

Support. A support desk cannot restore access to an asset it has no key to. What a non-custodial app can do is tell you exactly what happened and where to look, which is less comforting than it sounds, but it is also the reason it cannot lose your funds for you.

The middle ground is real, and it is still self-custody

Hardware signers keep the key off the machine that browses the internet. Browser wallets hold it in the extension. Mobile wallets, sometimes with biometric unlock and a local encrypted vault, keep it on the phone. All three are non-custodial in the sense that matters here: the operator cannot move your assets.

What changes between them is where the single point of failure sits — a piece of paper, a device, or a passphrase — and how much friction stands between an attacker and your balance. There is no configuration where the failure point disappears.

A short checklist for choosing

Ask four questions. Who can move the asset without my involvement? If this company disappears tomorrow, what do I still have? If my device is lost, what is the recovery path and have I actually written it down? And: do I understand what I am being asked to sign, line by line?

If the answer to the last one is no, the custody model is not your biggest risk yet. Approval screens are where most losses actually start, custodial or not.

At a glance

At a glance

Custody in this app

None. FBT Swap does not take deposits and holds no keys

Recovery phrase

Never requested by the app — anyone who asks for it is not this app

What we can do

Show you the quote, the route, the fee and the exact transaction to sign

What nobody can do

Reverse a signed transaction or recover a lost phrase

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Clear answers before you decide.

Does FBT Swap hold my funds at any point?

No. The swap interface never takes deposits, never holds a recovery phrase and never signs on a user’s behalf. Assets stay in the connected wallet and every swap needs that wallet’s approval.

If I lose my phone, can support restore my wallet?

No, and no non-custodial service can. Access is restored by the recovery phrase or the backup you made, which is why writing it down — offline, in more than one place — is part of using self-custody rather than an optional extra.

Is a custodial account safer for a beginner?

It removes the recovery-phrase risk and adds counterparty risk: the operator can freeze, delay or lose your balance, and you hold a claim rather than an asset. Neither model is risk-free; they fail in different ways.

Risk notice

Crypto assets are volatile and on-chain transactions cannot be reversed. You can lose money, including all of it. Nothing here is financial advice.