نسخهٔ فارسی

Transparent, non-custodial, yours

Picking a network with four questions

Liquidity depth for your pair, gas cost against your size, where your funds already are, and where you want to end up. In that order.

First question Where the funds already are — avoiding a bridge usually wins
Second Price impact for your actual size on that pair
Third Gas as a percentage of the trade

FBT Swap

What you should know

With seventeen networks available the choice can look arbitrary. It is not — four questions settle it almost every time, and they are quick to answer.

The order matters, because optimising the wrong one first is how people end up bridging twice to save a dollar of gas.

Where are your funds now?

Trading where your assets already sit avoids a bridge entirely, with its fee, its delay and its risk. This usually dominates everything else for amounts that are not large.

If the pair you want has adequate depth there, stop. You have your answer.

Is the pair deep enough for your size?

Check the price impact for your actual amount, not the pair in the abstract. A major pair with millions in depth on one chain can have a few thousand on another, and your order hits a completely different curve.

If price impact exceeds roughly one percent, it is worth comparing another network before continuing.

Depth also changes through the day. A pair that is comfortable during active hours can thin out noticeably when its main participants are offline, and a quote taken at one hour is not a promise about another. Re-quote at the moment you intend to trade.

What does gas cost relative to the trade?

Fixed gas dominates small trades. A swap costing a few dollars of gas is irrelevant on a large trade and crippling on a small one, which is why network choice is effectively a function of size.

For small amounts, any low-fee network beats mainnet by so much that nothing else needs considering.

Where do you want the output?

If the tokens are going to a protocol, an exchange deposit or another wallet, trade on the chain that destination expects. Swapping on a cheap chain and then bridging the output often costs more than swapping where it was needed.

FBT Swap supports BNB Chain, Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Avalanche, Linea, Sonic, Mantle, Berachain, Unichain, Monad, Scroll, zkSync Era, Robinhood Chain and Solana, and shows route, price impact and fee for whichever you select.

At a glance

At a glance

First question

Where the funds already are — avoiding a bridge usually wins

Second

Price impact for your actual size on that pair

Third

Gas as a percentage of the trade

Fourth

Where the output needs to end up

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Clear answers before you decide.

Is the cheapest network always best?

No. Cheap gas with thin liquidity can cost more in price impact than expensive gas with deep liquidity, particularly for larger trades. Compare the total, not the gas.

Should I bridge to get a better rate?

Only when the improvement clearly exceeds bridge cost, delay and risk. For most retail-sized trades it does not, and the bridge adds a failure mode the swap did not have.

How do I compare networks quickly?

Request a quote for the same pair and amount on each candidate and compare the output after fees. The price impact figure makes depth differences obvious immediately.

Risk notice

Crypto assets are volatile and on-chain transactions cannot be reversed. You can lose money, including all of it. Nothing here is financial advice.