نسخهٔ فارسی

Transparent, non-custodial, yours

An alert tells you something happened — it does not act

Alerts solve the attention problem, not the execution problem. How to set thresholds that are not noise, and what an alert cannot do.

Solves The attention problem — you stop watching continuously
Does not solve Execution; an alert never places an order
Good threshold Tied to a decision you have already made

FBT Swap

What you should know

Watching a market continuously is not possible and not useful. An alert replaces watching with a condition that fires when it is met, which is a genuine improvement in how you spend attention.

It is also the limit. An alert notifies. It does not place an order, and anyone implying otherwise is selling something.

Setting thresholds that mean something

A threshold should correspond to a decision you have already made. "Notify me if this drops twelve percent" is useful if twelve percent changes what you do; otherwise it is noise you will learn to ignore.

Percentage moves relative to recent volatility are generally more informative than fixed prices, because a three percent move means different things for different assets.

Alert fatigue is the real failure

Too many alerts produce the same outcome as no alerts: they are dismissed without reading. A small number of alerts tied to real decisions outperforms a dashboard of notifications.

If an alert fires and you do nothing, either the threshold is wrong or the alert should not exist.

What alerts genuinely cover

Price thresholds, unusual volume relative to an asset's own median, approach to a level with a known touch history, and conditions on assets you hold. These are all checkable continuously and cheaply.

Delivery matters: an alert that arrives through a channel you do not check is not an alert.

Conditions should also be able to expire. An alert set during one market regime and left running for six months fires on a threshold that no longer means anything, and by the time it arrives you have usually forgotten why you set it in the first place.

The limitation stated plainly

An alert never fills an order. If the price moves while you are asleep, you receive a notification about something that already happened and may have reversed before you read it.

FBT Swap can monitor conditions and notify you. It cannot execute an unattended trade, because every swap requires your wallet signature — alerts never fill unattended.

At a glance

At a glance

Solves

The attention problem — you stop watching continuously

Does not solve

Execution; an alert never places an order

Good threshold

Tied to a decision you have already made

Main failure

Fatigue from too many alerts that change nothing

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Clear answers before you decide.

Can an alert buy for me automatically?

Not on a non-custodial interface. Every swap requires a wallet signature, so an alert notifies you and you decide. Automatic execution would require giving custody or signing authority to a third party.

How many alerts should I have?

Few enough that each one still gets read. If alerts fire regularly and you take no action, they have become background noise and the thresholds need rethinking.

Should I alert on price or percentage?

Percentage relative to the asset's recent volatility is usually more informative, because it adapts to how much the asset normally moves rather than assuming a fixed number is significant.

Risk notice

Crypto assets are volatile and on-chain transactions cannot be reversed. You can lose money, including all of it. Nothing here is financial advice.